A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cylindrically bent Laue analyzer in an X-ray Raman/emission spectrometer: performance tests and a comparison with spherically bent Bragg analyzers. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study compares the effectiveness of two types of X-ray analyzers: the spherically bent Bragg analyzer and the cylindrically bent Laue analyzer, focusing on their reflectivity and energy resolution using a SiO glass sample.
  • - Bragg analyzers perform well at photon energies up to 10 keV but experience a decline in reflectivity and resolution as energy increases, particularly beyond 20 keV.
  • - In contrast, Laue analyzers show improved reflectivity and steady resolution at energies over 10 keV, making them ideal for high-energy-resolution fluorescence-detection and X-ray emission spectroscopy of certain materials, with both analyzers demonstrating similar performance in specific measurements.

Article Abstract

The performances of a spherically bent Bragg analyzer and a cylindrically bent Laue analyzer in an X-ray Raman/emission spectrometer are compared. The reflectivity and energy resolution are evaluated from the intensity of the elastic scattering and the width of the energy distribution on a SiO glass sample. Widely used, Bragg analyzers display excellent performance at the photon energy E ≤ 10 keV. However, at higher E, the reflectivity and the resolution gradually deteriorate as E increases, showing poor performance above 20 keV. On the other hand, the reflectivity of the Laue analyzer gradually increases at E > 10 keV, displaying excellent reflectivity and good resolution around 20 keV. The Laue analyzer is suitable for X-ray absorption spectroscopy in high-energy-resolution fluorescence-detection mode or X-ray emission spectroscopy on 4d transition metal compounds. Furthermore, the X-ray Raman features of the lithium K-edge in LiF and the oxygen K-edge feature in HO, measured by nine Bragg analyzers (2 m radius) at E ≃ 9.9 keV and by five Laue analyzers (1.4 m radius) at E ≃ 19.5 keV, have been compared. Similar count rates and resolutions are observed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577524010634DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laue analyzer
16
bragg analyzers
12
cylindrically bent
8
bent laue
8
analyzer x-ray
8
x-ray raman/emission
8
raman/emission spectrometer
8
spherically bent
8
bent bragg
8
radius ≃
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!