Purpose - The use of the one abutment one time concept involves the indirect measurement of the implant stability without removing the previously placed abutment. This study aims to verify whether measuring the implant stability quotient at the abutment level is identical to the value obtained at the implant level. Material And Methods - A retrospective clinical study and an in vitro study were performed. For each study, the implant stability quotient measured at the implant level defined the control groups. The values obtained after the abutment seating composed the test groups, which were divided into three test sub-groups, corresponding to three different multi-unit abutments: straight (MUAS) and 17° angled (MUA17), both with 2.5 mm collar, and 30° angled (MUA30) with 3.5 mm collar. Data was compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results - Clinical results: the control group (59 implants; 79.14 [SD=3.39]) showed significantly higher measurements than the test group (73.22 [SD=8.54]); the sub-groups ClinicalMUA17 (16 abutments; 66.38 [SD=1.20]) and ClinicalMUA30 (16 abutments; 69.19 [SD=0.96]) measurements were lower than the control group. No differences were found for the ClinicalMUAS (27 abutments; 79.67 [SD=1.48]) sub-group when compared with the control group (correlation of 0.68). In vitro results: the control group measurements (36 implants; 68,02 [SD=1.81]) were significantly higher than the test group (62.57 [SD=2.87]). The control group measurements were also higher than each test sub-group (12 abutments each): MUAS (65.44 [SD=0.73]); MUA17 (60 [SD=0.43]); MUA30 (62.29 [SD = 0.35]). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, determining the implant stability quotient at abutment level results in lower values than measurements at implant level, and may not accurately reflect the actual implant stability. Future research will need to explore whether, and under what circumstances a correlation exists between the implant stability quotient measured at the implant level and at the abutment level.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10977DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implant stability
28
control group
20
abutment level
16
stability quotient
16
implant level
16
implant
10
level
8
retrospective clinical
8
quotient abutment
8
quotient measured
8

Similar Publications

Background: Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation is an important treatment option for patients with advanced CHF. Referral to an early, intensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in these patients seems still underused. This observational descriptive study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an early intensive CR program in LVAD recipients, also comparing results with a matched group of advanced HFrEF patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) induced by rapid bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on urinary catheters is a key issue that urgently needs to be addressed. To prevent CAUTI, many contact-killing, non-leaching coatings have been developed for the surfaces of silicone catheters. However, due to the chemical inertness of the silicone substrate, most current coatings lack adhesion and are unstable under external forces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of bioabsorbable screw versus metallic screw fixation for tibial tubercle fractures in adolescents: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

January 2025

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.

Background: Displaced tibial tubercle (TT) fractures in adolescents are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation. While metallic screw (MS) fixation provides strong stability, it often results in a high incidence of postoperative screw head protrusion or irritation, leading to additional removal surgery. Bioabsorbable screw (BS) fixation presents an alternative that may avoid these issues, though its stability has not yet been extensively documented in the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to assess the stability of immediate dental implants in fresh molar extraction sockets and to compare those placed in the maxilla and mandible. This was a controlled, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial; the maxilla was the test group and the mandible was the control group. Thirty patients with an unrestorable molar tooth who needed immediate implant placement were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the 3-year outcomes of the modified minimally invasive Ponto surgery (m-MIPS) to both the original MIPS (o-MIPS) and linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation (LIT-TP) for inserting bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs).

Study Design: Prospective study with three patient groups: m-MIPS, o-MIPS, and LIT-TP.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!