Application of the brown macroalga (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) as a feed ingredient for livestock: A review.

Anim Nutr

Animal Science, Production and Welfare Division, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture (FBA), Nord University, Steinkjer 7713, Norway.

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Marine macroalgae, particularly brown macroalgae like sugar kelp, are being explored as sustainable livestock feed due to their high nutritional value and biomass yield.
  • Inclusion of sugar kelp in animal diets has shown potential benefits such as increased milk and meat quality, along with reduced methane emissions; however, concerns about high iodine content and toxic elements must be managed.
  • Effective post-harvest processing techniques, particularly hydrothermal treatments, are vital to enhance safety and nutritional quality, but their energy demands and impact on nutrient availability pose challenges for sustainable use in livestock feed.

Article Abstract

In recent years, marine macroalgae have been recognized as potential alternative and sustainable feeding resources for livestock. Differences in nutritional values and biomass yield across macroalgal species are critical factors while aiming to utilize them as animal feed components. A brown macroalga, , also known as sugar kelp, has a promising biomass yield and high nutritional and bioactive compounds that can benefit both ruminant and monogastric animals. For example, the dietary inclusion of in dairy and beef cattle can enhance milk yield, meat quality, and iodine content in milk and meat while reducing enteric methane emissions in vitro. However, high iodine content and the presence of some potentially toxic elements (arsenic, cadmium, etc.) lead to critical challenges, demanding careful consideration while determining the inclusion level of in the livestock feed. To address these challenges, effective post-harvest biomass processing techniques, particularly hydrothermal treatments, have shown promise in reducing heavy metals and minerals of concern (e.g., iodine) and enhancing their safety as animal feed. It is thus essential to evaluate the sustainability of post-harvest processing techniques as they are usually energy-demanding and can negatively influence nutrient utilization in animals as certain digestible fractions can disappear during processing. Furthermore, variations in the nutritional and bioactive composition of due to seasonal and spatial factors can create challenges for commercial exploitation. In this context, multiple harvesting of biomass and choosing the appropriate harvesting seasons can maximize the nutritional potential of . In conclusion, can be a novel feed ingredient for livestock, but year-round biomass availability and identifying cost-effective and energy-efficient post-harvest biomass processing methods that optimize both nutritional values and digestibility of are critical for improving animal production, performance, and health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615894PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brown macroalga
8
feed ingredient
8
ingredient livestock
8
nutritional values
8
biomass yield
8
animal feed
8
nutritional bioactive
8
iodine content
8
post-harvest biomass
8
biomass processing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!