Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) software in a quaternary stroke centre as well as assess the accuracy and efficacy of StrokeViewer software in large vessel occlusion detection and its potential impact on radiological workflow.
Materials And Methods: Data were collected during two separate three-month periods comparing the accuracy rate of StrokeViewer in detection of large vessel occlusion to that of a junior registrar. During the first three months, 37 cases were identified and during the second leg, 47. The second leg of the study was performed due to a high number of technical failures during the first one and in an attempt to improve those via communication with the manufacturer and co-operation between allied healthcare professionals. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.
Results: Technical failure rate was 25% in the first leg and reduced to 17% in the second leg, showing a trend to statistical significance. Specificity and sensitivity of StrokeViewer were similar in the two legs of the study, measuring 91% and 93% initially and 94% and 93% finally, respectively. Efficacy was comparable to that of the junior registrar with StrokeViewer, demonstrating 92% accuracy during the first leg vs 95% by the junior registrar and 93% in the second leg vs 98% by the junior registrar. These did not show statistical significance.
Conclusion: This is a real-life analysis of StrokeViewer efficacy and its potential failures, showing a reduction in failure rate, accuracy rate of a junior registrar, and sensitivity and specificity values close to the advertised ones.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106745 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!