AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how the perfusion index (PI) response to a specific stress test can indicate sympathetic-vascular reactions in patients with sepsis compared to healthy individuals and critically ill patients without sepsis.
  • Three groups were analyzed: healthy patients (Group A), critically ill patients without sepsis (Group B), and septic patients (Group C), focusing on their hemodynamic responses and changes in the perfusion index during a semiorthostatic stress test.
  • Findings showed that healthy individuals exhibited expected changes in cardiac function, while septic patients displayed variable responses; notably, those with a decreased perfusion index after the test had better outcomes (lower SOFA scores) after 72 hours, suggesting that monitoring the PI may

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress can be used to monitor the sympathetic-vascular response in sepsis patients.

Methods: Three groups were studied: Group A (30 healthy patients), Group B (30 critically ill patients without sepsis), and Group C (92 septic patients). The patients underwent a semiorthostatic stress test (head elevation from 0 to 60 degrees), and hemodynamics, perfusion index values and cardiac ultrasound data were evaluated. SOFA scores were also evaluated in septic patients, comparing those with increased and decreased perfusion indices after the test.

Results: After the test, Group A presented significant reductions in stroke volume (p < 0.01) and the cardiac index (p < 0.05), with increases in heart rate (p < 0.05) and mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001). These responses were not observed in Groups B and C. In the individual analysis of Group A, there was a decrease in the perfusion index (p < 0,001), whereas in Groups B and C, the response was heterogeneous. Additionally, septic patients who had a reduced perfusion index after the test had a significant decrease in the SOFA score at 72 hours compared with the group with an increased perfusion index (p < 0.05). However, the delta-SOFA score did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: The perfusion index response to semiorthostatic stress in sepsis patients is a simple and inexpensive method that can be used to detect the sympathetic-microvascular response at the bedside and appears to have prognostic value.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634235PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240090-enDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

semiorthostatic stress
16
perfusion response
12
response semiorthostatic
12
septic patients
12
perfusion
7
patients
7
response
6
group
6
peripheral perfusion
4
semiorthostatic
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess how the perfusion index (PI) response to a specific stress test can indicate sympathetic-vascular reactions in patients with sepsis compared to healthy individuals and critically ill patients without sepsis.
  • Three groups were analyzed: healthy patients (Group A), critically ill patients without sepsis (Group B), and septic patients (Group C), focusing on their hemodynamic responses and changes in the perfusion index during a semiorthostatic stress test.
  • Findings showed that healthy individuals exhibited expected changes in cardiac function, while septic patients displayed variable responses; notably, those with a decreased perfusion index after the test had better outcomes (lower SOFA scores) after 72 hours, suggesting that monitoring the PI may
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!