AI Article Synopsis

  • GERD is a common digestive disorder that is often treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but some patients look for natural alternatives like Benesco™, which contains quercetin.
  • This study assessed the effects of Benesco™ on esophageal sensitivity, barrier function, and reflux symptoms in patients diagnosed with GERD.
  • The results showed no significant improvements in acid perception, mucosal barrier function, or reflux symptoms after treatment with Benesco™, indicating it may not be effective for GERD management.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of GERD management however a subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies. Benesco™ is an over-the-counter supplement, of which the active ingredient is quercetin and has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of benesco™ on esophageal sensitivity, mucosal barrier function, and reflux symptoms.

Methods: Patients with GERD were evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy, and esophageal biopsies.

Results: 8 patients (3 men, median age 45 (34-64)) were included. The perfusion sensitivity score (PSS) did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (90.5 (21.4-129.7) to 62.5 (16.4-96.9) p = 0.123). Esophageal sensitivity based on the maximum reported VAS score during the esophageal acid perfusion test did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (7.4 (5.3-9.8) to 7.7 (5.3-8.7) p = 0.482). Furthermore, no effects were seen on measures of mucosal barrier function such as extracellular in vivo impedance (ETIS) (6807 (5153-8883) Ω·m vs 6702 (5106-7847) Ω·m, p = 0.575), in vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (183 (153-204) Ω.cm2 vs 201 (128-250) Ω.cm2, p = 1.000), or fluorescein flux (896 (73-1922) nmol/cm/h vs 811 (187-2693) nmol/cm/h, p = 0.237).

Conclusion: We did not observe an improvement of acid perception, mucosal barrier function, or reflux symptoms by benesco™ in this study.

Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register number: NL9324.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barrier function
20
mucosal barrier
16
esophageal sensitivity
12
function reflux
12
benesco™ esophageal
8
sensitivity mucosal
8
reflux symptoms
8
acid perfusion
8
change treatment
8
treatment benesco™
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!