Effect of fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, microbial communities, and methane production in cattle.

Introduction: Biochar has gained significant attention as a possible anti-methanogenic supplement for ruminants due to its potential to reduce methane (CH₄) emissions from enteric fermentation. However, its effects on rumen methanogenesis have been inconsistent and, in some cases, contradictory. These variations are likely influenced by factors such as the type of biochar used, its source material, and how it is administered, including the form in which it is provided and the dosage needed to achieve desired outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effects of two fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, CH emissions, and the rumen microbiome of cattle-fed roughage-based diets. Two experiments were conducted to assess the potential of biochar in mitigating CH emissions.

Experiment 1: This was a controlled pen trial conducted over 56 days, involving 12 steers that were fed Rhodes grass hay . The animals were assigned to one of four treatment groups: control (no biochar, only molasses), low dose (50 g biochar/animal/day), mid dose (100 g biochar/animal/day), or high dose (200 g biochar/animal/day). Two types of biochar, Biochar 1 and Biochar 2, were administered with molasses (200 mL per animal/day). Methane emissions were measured using open-circuit respiration chambers, and rumen fluid samples were collected for analysis of the rumen microbial community and fermentation metabolite.

Experiment 2: In this trial, 45 heifers were selected and grazed together in a single paddock for 60 days to assess the effects of biochar on productivity and CH emissions under grazing conditions. The animals were allocated to one of three treatment groups (15 animals per group): control (no biochar, only molasses), Biochar 1, or Biochar 2. Each group was administered biochar at an estimated single dose of 100 g per animal/day mixed with molasses. Methane emissions were measured using GreenFeed systems in the field to monitor CH₄ production from individual animals.

Results: In the controlled pen trial (Experiment 1), biochar supplementation resulted in a reduction of CH₄ emissions by 8.8-12.9% without any negative effects on rumen fermentation or dry matter intake (DMI). Minor changes were observed in the rumen bacterial community, particularly in the and families. However, in the grazing trial (Experiment 2), no significant differences in CH₄ emissions or productivity were detected with biochar supplementation.

Conclusion: While the results from controlled feeding conditions suggest that biochar has the potential to reduce enteric CH₄ emissions, the lack of significant findings under grazing conditions highlights the need for further research. Future studies should focus on identifying biochar types, doses, and delivery methods that are effective in reducing CH₄ emissions in grazing systems without compromising cattle productivity.