AI Article Synopsis

  • Psychological factors significantly impact acute coronary syndrome (ACS) recovery, yet interventions addressing these factors are often absent in cardiac rehabilitation programs due to mixed evidence on effectiveness.
  • This study tested a combined cognitive-behavioral treatment and positive psychology therapy program against standard rehabilitation in 87 ACS patients, measuring various psychological and clinical outcomes at different intervals.
  • Results indicated that the intervention group experienced notable improvements in depression, anger management, and cognitive function, while the control group showed declines in these areas, although both groups had similar advancements in overall clinical outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Although psychological factors play a significant role in the onset and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), psychological interventions (PIs) are rarely included in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs due to inconclusive evidence regarding specific intervention components and effect sizes. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a PI based on cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) and positive psychology therapy (PPT) in improving psychological and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS.

Methods: This trial was an open-label randomized controlled trial that compared a combined CBT and PPT-based PI (the program) with a standard CR program (control group). We recruited 87 ACS patients, and psychological outcomes, functional capacity, biochemical and anthropometric measures, and clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2 months, and 9 months after the ACS event.

Results: The group showed significant improvements in depression, anger traits, anger-in, and anger control-out compared to the control group. Additionally, the intervention was associated with the improved maintenance of cognitive function, social support, and spiritual coping styles, while the control group showed deterioration in these areas. Patients experiencing severe ACS showed significant improvement in personal strength and meaning as a result of the intervention. However, no significant effects were observed on anxiety, anger-out, emotion regulation skills, dispositional optimism, other personal strengths, or quality of life. Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in functional capacity and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: The study suggests that CBT and PPT-based PIs may offer additional benefits for ACS patients, particularly regarding their psychological health. Further larger trials are required to confirm these findings.

Clinical Trial Registration: identifier, NCT05287061.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611559PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420137DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
12
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
cognitive-behavioral treatment
8
positive psychology
8
psychology therapy
8
acute coronary
8
coronary syndrome
8
clinical outcomes
8
cbt ppt-based
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!