AI Article Synopsis

  • BAP1 mutations lead to a loss of function affecting cell cycle and DNA repair, making patients potentially responsive to PARP inhibitors like niraparib.
  • A phase II trial evaluated niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to have mBAP1 mutations, focusing on response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
  • Despite not meeting the primary efficacy goal, some clinical benefits were observed in patients with confirmed mBAP1 mutations, suggesting the need for further research.

Article Abstract

Purpose: BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.

Methods: This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results: From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with , , , , and mutations.

Conclusion: Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616782PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00406DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dna damage
8
response
8
damage response
8
tumors harbor
8
cohort cohort
8
cohort best
8
best response
8
months 95%
8
patients
7
cohort
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!