A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Mechanical properties of discarded shield residue improved by calcium carbide slag and fly ash as subgrade filling. | LitMetric

To utilize discarded shield residue and alleviate the shortage of subgrade filling, industrial wastes such as calcium carbide slag (CCS) and fly ash (FA) were considered to enhance the mechanical properties of the shield residue. A series of laboratory tests, including California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, moisture content tests, pH tests, water stability tests, and dry-wet cycles tests were performed on discarded shield residue with additive contents. The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. The early UCS of CCS-FA stabilized soil is slightly lower than that of QL-FA stabilized soil. After 60 curing days, all stabilized soil exhibited a UCS value exceeding 1.9 MPa. In addition, the CBR values of CCS-FA stabilized soil were more than 8 times higher than those of the original shield residue. Furthermore, the water stability of CCS-FA stabilized soil is slightly better than QL-FA stabilized soil, especially at 7 days and 14 days. As for dry-wet cycles test, after the fifth cycle, the CCS-FA stabilized soil maintained overall integrity. The CCS can effectively replace QL to enhance the mechanical properties of shield residue as subgrade filling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614222PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314597PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stabilized soil
32
shield residue
24
ccs-fa stabilized
16
mechanical properties
12
discarded shield
12
subgrade filling
12
calcium carbide
8
carbide slag
8
fly ash
8
enhance mechanical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!