A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In vivo study to evaluate an intelligent algorithm for time efficient detection of malignant melanoma using dermatofluoroscopy. | LitMetric

Introduction: Dermatofluoroscopy is an optical non-invasive method of melanoma/nevus differentiation that has shown 89% sensitivity and 45% specificity in clinical trials, but long measurement duration hinders clinical use. An intelligent algorithm was developed to shorten the measurement time without compromising its diagnostic accuracy. It uses dermoscopic images of the skin lesions to be measured to select measurement points based on the assessment of color values.

Methods: 27 patients with a total of 29 lesions suggestive of cutaneous melanoma were included in a clinical study and measured with both methods, conventional dermatofluoroscopy and the newly developed intelligent algorithm. The results were compared to the independent findings of two histopathologists to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and time saved.

Results: There was a median reduction of measurement points from 265 to 158 (40%). Meanwhile, the intelligent algorithm showed a higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional dermatofluoroscopy (AUC of 72% vs. 63%).

Conclusion: The intelligent algorithm did not perform inferior to the conventional method while saving 40% of time. However, measurement times remain long compared to other non-invasive methods of diagnosing malignant melanoma. Further studies are needed to evaluate clinical suitability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000542854DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intelligent algorithm
20
diagnostic accuracy
12
malignant melanoma
8
measurement points
8
conventional dermatofluoroscopy
8
intelligent
5
algorithm
5
measurement
5
vivo study
4
study evaluate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!