AI Article Synopsis

  • Reasoning involves drawing conclusions from information, with two main types: deductive (drawing specific conclusions from general principles) and inductive (generalizing from specific instances).
  • Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that different brain areas, specifically the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), are used for these reasoning types, but results have been inconsistent.
  • This study utilized high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on these brain areas to assess their roles in reasoning, finding that IFG stimulation can impair deductive reasoning tasks, while DLPFC stimulation improves performance on challenging inductive reasoning tasks.

Article Abstract

Reasoning is the ability to formulate inferences or conclusions from available information. The two major types, deductive and inductive, are thought to rely on distinct cognitive mechanisms and recruit separate brain areas. Neuroimaging studies yield mixed results; some found the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activations for deductive reasoning and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for inductive reasoning. This assumption was put to the test in the present study. In two double-blinded, sham-controlled experiments, high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) was used to systematically explore the left IFG's and DLPFC's causal role in deductive and inductive reasoning. Participants with no formal training in logic judged deductive and inductive arguments before and after 10 minutes of anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS of the left IFG (Experiment 1, n = 20) or left DLPFC (Experiment 2, n = 21). Left IFG anodal tDCS impairs reaction times (RTs) for easy categorical (p = < .001) and propositional (p = .025) deductive arguments and the accuracy for easy inductive propositional arguments (p = .003). Meanwhile, regardless of the active stimulation conditions, left DLPFC tDCS shortens RTs (anodal: p = < .001, cathodal: p = .014) and increases accuracy (anodal: p = .029, cathodal: p = .001) for difficult categorical inductive arguments, but decreases accuracy (anodal: p = .027, cathodal: p = < .001) for difficult propositional inductive arguments. The overall results showed a partial dissociation of the left frontal lobe areas subserving the two types of reasoning and argument difficulty-dependent stimulation effects. This study extends knowledge of the neural basis of reasoning and hopefully inspires interventions that could augment reasoning impairments associated with normal aging and brain lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611129PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312919PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deductive inductive
12
inductive arguments
12
left
10
left inferior
8
inferior frontal
8
frontal gyrus
8
left dorsolateral
8
dorsolateral prefrontal
8
prefrontal cortex
8
reasoning
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!