Surveillance imaging at 45 to 90 days after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or cardiac computed tomography (CT) is recommended to assess device position and the presence of device-related complications such as device-related thrombus (DRT) or peridevice leak. Detection of DRT is associated with a significantly increased risk of a stroke or systemic embolization event within 6 months of detection. Nonetheless, there is significant variability in detection of DRT as a result of timing, frequency, and imaging modality used for surveillance. The process of DRT formation vs benign device endothelization is not known. Here we highlight the spectrum of imaging findings seen on TEE and CT and emphasize the need for unified definitions and standardized reporting of imaging findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602609PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.102661DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

device-related thrombus
8
detection drt
8
imaging findings
8
imaging
5
imaging spectrum
4
spectrum device-related
4
thrombus percutaneous
4
percutaneous left atrial appendage
4
left atrial appendage occlusion
4
occlusion surveillance
4

Similar Publications

The main objective of this study was to investigate the optimal post-left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) anticoagulation strategy, focusing on minimizing device-related thrombosis (DRT) and thromboembolism (TE) events without increasing bleeding risk. After successful LAAC, consecutive participants were treated with 45-day anticoagulants (rivaroxaban 15 mg daily, dabigatran 110 mg twice a day, and warfarin). The efficacy endpoints included DRT, TE, and hospital readmissions due to cardiac caused, while safety endpoints encompassed bleeding events, monitored over a 12-month follow-up period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to avoid oral anticoagulants, but issues like incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) can lead to complications.
  • A study compared the endothelialization rates after implantation of two devices: the Watchman plug and the LACBES occluder, in 201 patients, using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
  • Results showed that the LACBES occluder had a higher IDE rate at both 3 and 6 months compared to the Watchman device, indicating that it takes longer for the LACBES to achieve complete endothelialization after LAAC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) has become the treatment of choice for acute, complicated type B aortic dissections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of the GORE TAG 08-01 study on TEVAR for acute, complicated type B aortic dissections using the Conformable GORE® TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis (CTAG), and to establish if late aortic complications are avoided and remodeling is sustained.

Methods: From January 2010 to February 2017, 50 patients with acute, complicated type B aortic dissections were enrolled from 26 sites in the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Impella RP and RP Flex can provide right ventricular (RV) support in numerous clinical situations. Notably, the redesigned RP Flex allows for an internal jugular approach compared to the femoral venous approach with RP.

Aims: We investigated the type and frequency of device-related complications as reported in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Experience (MAUDE) for both Impella RP and RP Flex to see if there are any differences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of intensive versus nonintensive antithrombotic treatment on device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)

December 2024

Institut Clínic Cardiovascular (ICCV), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.

Introduction And Objectives: The optimal antithrombotic therapy (AT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is debated. We assessed the impact of intensive vs nonintensive AT on the incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) based on whether the device implantation was classified as optimal or suboptimal.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent successful LAAC in 9 centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!