This article uses the mythological figure of the satyr to examine European attitudes towards incorporating mythical creatures into zoology and, more broadly, to survey attempts to reconcile the relative status of myth modern science. Evidence is used from the past five hundred years to argue for the longevity of these debates, which continue to repeat the same arguments based on the same sources. It is argued that scholars' attitudes towards Ancient civilizations play a significant role in explaining whether they decide to consider the satyr as the product of the imperfect observation of monkeys or as a creature on its own right.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2024.2433643 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!