AI Article Synopsis

  • Dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement (dCAIS) enables precise implant insertion with real-time tracking, but there’s a lack of knowledge about the learning curve for anterior versus posterior placements.
  • The study involved 8 participants (4 novice, 4 experienced) practicing four implant placements in both anterior and posterior groups, analyzing their performance over five sessions.
  • Results showed that posterior placements had more deviations than anterior during initial sessions, while experienced operators completed tasks faster. However, accuracy improved uniformly with practice for both groups.

Article Abstract

Statement Of Problem: Dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement (dCAIS) facilitates precise implant placement through a real-time tracking system, enabling single-visit treatment. However, an understanding of the learning curve associated with dCAIS in terms of differences between anterior and posterior implant placement is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro trial was to observe the learning curve for anterior and posterior implant placement in novice and experienced operators using dCAIS in a type-III bone model simulated maxilla.

Material And Methods: Eight participants, including 4 novice and 4 experienced operators, were randomly assigned in blocks to either the anterior or posterior placement group. Before the experiment, the participants received video-training. Each participant performed 4 single implant placements per session with a 7 ±1 day wash-out period, totaling 5 practice sessions. Three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 2-way ANOVA were used to analyze the effects of practice sessions, operator experience, and implant location on operating time and placement deviation. The operating time, coronal, depth, and angle deviations in each session were recorded and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to express the learning curve (α=.05).

Results: The analysis of 160 implants showed significantly higher coronal and angle deviation in the posterior group than in the anterior group during the first and second practice session (P<.05), with no significant differences observed from the third to the fifth practice session; the anterior group exhibited consistent performance from the first practice session. Novice and experienced operators exhibited statistically different operating times, particularly during the first practice session (P<.05), with no differences in accuracy being observed (P>.05). Operating time decreased with the increasing number of practice sessions in all groups.

Conclusions: A learning curve for placing anterior implants with dCAIS may not be necessary for either novice or experienced operators. However, in posterior implant placement, a minimum of 3 practice sessions was found beneficial for both novice and experienced operators.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implant placement
24
learning curve
16
anterior posterior
16
posterior implant
12
novice experienced
12
experienced operators
12
curve anterior
8
implant
8
placement
8
dynamic computer-assisted
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!