Graft selection for ACL reconstruction remains controversial. In addition, an increasing number of ACL reconstructions (ACLR) are being performed in an aging population, creating a potential gap in evidence. The goal is to restore functional stability to the knee, minimize the likelihood of graft failure, and provide patient satisfaction achieved primarily by a patient's ability to return to unrestricted physical activity. Due to an unacceptably high risk of allograft failure in younger patients, the use of allograft for ACL reconstruction has substantially decreased over the last two decades. However, postoperative activity, rather than age in isolation, determines ACL allograft reconstruction success. While allograft is rarely indicated in patients who regularly participate in cutting and pivoting activities, regardless of age, a patient-specific approach should consider age, potential donor site morbidity, and postoperative activity goals. In our experience, allograft ACLR is not indicated in patients younger than 35 years of age (with very rare exceptions of sedentary individuals preferring to minimize donor site morbidity). Allograft is not recommended in any patient, regardless of age, who regularly participates in cutting and pivoting sports, particularly level I sports that include jumping, cutting, and hard pivoting. Finally, while surgeons should err toward using autograft when in doubt, allograft may be selectively indicated in older and low physical demand patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.076 | DOI Listing |
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Memorial Hermann Rockets Sports Medicine Institute, Department of Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is indicated in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to restore proper arthrokinematics and load distribution for the meniscus-deficient knee. Objective outcomes after ACL reconstruction with concomitant MAT in athletic populations are scarcely reported and highly variable.
Purpose: To compare patient outcomes using an objective functional performance battery, self-reported outcome measures, and return-to-sport rates between individuals undergoing ACL reconstruction with concomitant MAT and a matched group undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction.
Arthroscopy
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, 322, Seoyang-ro, Hwasun, 58128, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Purpose: To compare graft remodeling, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR).
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent primary ACLR with quadruple hamstring grafts between January 2019 and March 2022, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the addition of ALLR with tibialis anterior allografts: an isolated ACLR group and an ACLR + ALLR group.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthrosc Tech
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, U.S.A.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and subsequent surgical reconstruction are exceedingly common orthopaedic procedures. Surgical technique and graft preparation techniques continue to evolve as surgeons seek to increase surgical outcomes and decrease recovery time. As such, there is significant interest in identifying tools and techniques that may enhance the surgical process for patients undergoing an ACL reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthroscopy
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, U.S.A.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, U.S.A.. Electronic address:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic sports medicine surgeries. Its prevalence in the sports medicine sphere is matched by the numerous options of different techniques. Chief among these is graft selection, which most commonly falls into 1 of 4 options: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft (HT), quadriceps tendon autograft, and allografts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!