Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Purpose: Neuromix is a fast, motion robust multi-contrast sequence capable of providing all diagnostic contrasts in ∼3.5 minutes. However, more evaluation is needed across the various contrasts compared to gold standard, optimized sequences routinely used in the clinic. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine how NeuroMix performs in the clinical setting compared to routine clinical MRI.
Methods: NeuroMix and routine clinical MRI sequences were acquired on a 3 Tesla clinical scanner for 39 patients clinically indicated for brain MRI. Three radiologists were asked to assess the diagnostic confidence of NeuroMix compared to the routine MRI using a series of questions. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were assessed for NeuroMix. Fleiss' free-marginal multirater kappa was calculated for the qualitative assessment performed by the radiologists.
Results: Radiologists were comfortable substituting or reading some of the NeuroMix sequences in place of the corresponding conventional sequence for some contrasts, including diffusion-weighted imaging, single-shot T, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. The image quality, SNR, and CNR allowed the radiologists to visualize anatomy and pathology on NeuroMix images. There was no significant difference between coefficient of variation for the apparent diffusion coefficient maps (p = .084).
Conclusions: Analysis revealed both positives and some pitfalls of NeuroMix. However, these results indicate Neuromix as having the capability to be a backup sequence in case artifacts are present in routine sequences, or potentially a replacement for some contrasts altogether.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.13248 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!