A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endovenous treatment for varicose veins of the lower limbs: Comparative histological evaluation of different techniques. | LitMetric

Background: In recent years, tumescent ablative techniques have been joined by non-tumescent ablative techniques. The aim of the research is to study and compare the effects produced by the different endovascular ablative techniques, from the histological point of view, at the level of the venous wall (endothelium, tunica media and adventitia).

Method: The study involves the use of three ablative endovascular techniques (EVLA, MOCA, CGO) on bench for the treatment of the great saphenous vein. The bench procedure was performed in the same way as described in the instructions for use (IFU) of the technical specifications. Tissue samples were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). They were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and, in a case, with anti-ERG antibody (MA5-26,245, Termo Fisher).

Result: No perivascular tissue was present. No hematoma or perforation of the vein wall was observed. Histopathological changes after EVLA indicated that the intima including the endothelium and sub-endothelium was completely necrotized. It was observed that the thermal-energy-induced injury in the intima did not reach deeper than the media. Overview shows that in this case the damage is homogenously spread along the entire perimeter. The most evident change in the sample treated with mechanical-chemical ablation (MOCA) technique was the endothelial damage with loss of endothelial cells. Specifically, with the ERG immunostaining it was possible to observe the presence of numerous nuclei exposed towards the lumen of the vein. In the sample treated with cyanoacrylate (CGO), no significant structural alterations were observed. However, an almost complete collapse of the endoluminal walls and the presence of cyanoacrylate residues were observed.

Conclusion: Different histological patterns characterize the individual treatments. However, all techniques have a common feature: the damage is not transmural and the three different layers of the venous walls are always recognizable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555241304572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ablative techniques
12
sample treated
8
techniques
6
endovenous treatment
4
treatment varicose
4
varicose veins
4
veins lower
4
lower limbs
4
limbs comparative
4
comparative histological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!