A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite coatings on 316 L stainless steel for biomedical applications. | LitMetric

In addition to the basic and main parts of hospital equipment, 316 L stainless steel is widely utilized in futures such as nails and screws, wires and medical bone clips, dental implants, heart springs (stents), needles, surgical scissors, etc. In the present study, the electrophoretic deposition of a composite based on chitosan (CS), gelatin, nano and microparticles of hydroxyapatite on a 316 L stainless steel substrate was investigated. Hydroxyapatite particles are added to it due to the ossification abilities of steel and due to an enhanced adhesion and bone production, CS and biocompatible gelatin polymer particles were also added to hydroxyapatite. These particles were mixed in an ethanol/deionized water/acetic acid solution to create a suspension for the electrophoretic procedure. A mixture of 5 g lof hydroxyapatite, 0.5 g lof CS, and 1 g lwere present in the suspension. The best coating time was 1200s, and the best voltage was 30 V. The high density of the hydroxyapatite particles in the CS/gelatin polymer matrix was seen in scanning electron microscopy pictures. Additionally, the outcomes of the immersing samples in the simulated body fluid were evaluated, and the results revealed that, after 14 d, hydroxyapatite nanoparticles grew more rapidly than microparticles. The presence of CS, gelatin, and hydroxyapatite in the coating was verified by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and x-ray diffraction. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Potentiodynamic polarization in Phosphate-buffered saline were used to assess the corrosion results. In comparison to the bare sample, the corrosion resistance of the coated sample increased from 1.22 × 10to 7.17 × 10Ω.cmunder best circumstances, according to EIS results. Additionally, in the polarization test, the corrosion potential increased from -225.24 to -157.01 mV (vs. SCE) and the corrosion current dropped from 2.159 to 1.201 µA cm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ad98d6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

316 stainless
12
stainless steel
12
hydroxyapatite particles
12
electrophoretic deposition
8
hydroxyapatite
7
deposition chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite
4
chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite
4
nanocomposite coatings
4
coatings 316
4
steel
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!