AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on improving the detection of schistocytes, which are critical for diagnosing thrombotic microangiopathy, by using the automated digital microscopy system CellaVision® (DM1200), offering a more standardized approach compared to manual counting.* -
  • The automated system demonstrated high sensitivity (98.4%) and specificity (96.8%), and it had a lower variability between observers (25%) compared to traditional methods (50%), making it a strong candidate for training and standardization.* -
  • However, the technology has limitations, including occasional misclassification of platelets as schistocytes and a substantial percentage of red blood cells not being analyzed, which could potentially skew results.*

Article Abstract

Detection of schistocytes is an important first step in the differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy. It is however labor intensive and prone to subjectivity. To improve and standardize the detection and quantification of schistocytes, we studied its automated analysis by digital microscopy DM1200 (CellaVision®) on 63 positive and 102 negative smears obtained from SP-50 (Sysmex®). Easy to use and very useful for staff training, it showed a lower between-observer coefficient of variation than usually described for manual counting (25% vs. 50%). Very sensitive (100%) in pre-classification, the detection of schistocytes was highly sensitive (98.4%) and specific (96.8%) after reclassification (AUCROC = 0.9929), showing a good correlation with manual microscopy. TAT was comparable to manual counting. For positive smears, the percentage of schistocytes was similar between pre- and post-classification. However, 29.6% of pre-classified schistocytes were removed and 21.8% were added. For negative smears a significative overestimation of schistocytes (292%) was observed. Except poikilocytosis, on negative smears, the most common error of the software (24.9%) was due to platelets classified in schistocytes. Were also observed for example erroneous divisions of the image (3.2%) or artifactual schistocytes resulting from scratches in the smear (2.6%). Another limit is the high number of red blood cells not analyzed (46.8% for high-density smears), which might false the schistocytes percentage. To conclude, CellaVision® technology showed many benefits, but also limits that the operator needs to know.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1921DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

negative smears
12
schistocytes
9
detection schistocytes
8
manual counting
8
smears
5
[evaluation cellavision®
4
cellavision® dm-1200
4
dm-1200 system
4
system detecting
4
detecting quantifying
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!