Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Material extrusion-based three-dimensional (3D) printing is a widely used manufacturing technology for fabricating scaffolds and devices in bone tissue engineering (BTE). This technique involves two fundamentally different extrusion approaches: solution-based and melt-based printing. In solution-based printing, a polymer solution is extruded and solidifies solvent evaporation, whereas in melt-based printing, the polymer is melted at elevated temperatures and solidifies as it cools post-extrusion. Solution-based printing can also be enhanced to generate micro/nano-scale porosity through phase separation by printing the solution into a nonsolvent bath. The choice of the printing method directly affects scaffold properties and the biological response of stem cells. In this study, we selected polycaprolactone (PCL), a biodegradable polymer frequently used in BTE, blended with hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles, a bioceramic known for promoting bone formation, to investigate the effects of the printing approach on scaffold properties and performance using human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Our results showed that while both printing methods produced scaffolds with similar strut and overall scaffold dimensions, solvent-based printing resulted in porous struts, higher surface roughness, lower stiffness, and increased crystallinity compared to melt-based printing. Although stem cell viability and proliferation were not significantly influenced by the printing approach, melt-printed scaffolds promoted a more spread morphology and exhibited pronounced vinculin staining. Furthermore, composite scaffolds outperformed their neat counterparts, with melt-printed composite scaffolds significantly enhancing bone formation. This study highlights the critical role of the printing process in determining scaffold properties and performance, providing valuable insights for optimizing scaffold design in BTE.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d4sm01197j | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!