Comparison of three source attribution methods applied to whole genome sequencing data of monophasic and biphasic Typhimurium isolates from the British Isles and Denmark.

Methodologies for source attribution (SA) of foodborne illnesses comprise a rapidly expanding suite of techniques for estimating the most important source or sources of human infection. Recently, the increasing availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data for a wide range of bacterial strains has led to the development of novel SA methods. These techniques utilize the unique features of bacterial genomes adapted to different host types and hence offer increased resolution of the outputs. Comparative studies of different SA techniques reliant on WGS data are currently lacking. Here, we critically assessed and compared the outputs of three SA methods: a supervised classification random forest machine learning algorithm (RandomForest), an Accessory genes-Based Source Attribution method (AB_SA), and a Bayesian frequency matching method (Bayesian). Each technique was applied to the WGS data of a panel of 902 reservoir host and human monophasic and biphasic subsp. serovar Typhimurium isolates sampled in the British Isles (BI) and Denmark from 2012 to 2016. Additionally, for RandomForest and Bayesian, we explored whether utilization of accessory genome features as model inputs improved attribution accuracy of these methods over using the core genome derived features only. Results indicated that this was the case for RandomForest, but for Bayesian the overall attribution estimates varied little regardless of the inclusion or not of the accessory genome features. All three methods attributed the vast majority of human isolates to the Pigs primary source class, which was expected given the known high relative prevalence rates in pigs, and hence routes of infection into the human population, of monophasic and biphasic . Typhimurium in the BI and Denmark. The accuracy of AB_SA was lower than of RandomForest when attributing the primary source classes to the 120 animal test set isolates with known primary sources. A major advantage of both AB_SA and Bayesian was a much faster execution time as compared to RandomForest. Overall, the SA method comparison presented in this study describes the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three methods applied to attributing potential monophasic and biphasic . Typhimurium animal sources to human infections that could be valuable when deciding which SA methodology would be the most applicable to foodborne disease outbreak scenarios involving monophasic and biphasic . Typhimurium.