Background: Williams syndrome (WS) is a genetic, multisystemic, neurodevelopmental disorder, in which studies have demonstrated the presence of auditory deficits such as conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, cochlear weakness, and subclinical signs of hearing impairment. However, few studies have assessed this population's central auditory system.
Purpose: To analyze long-latency auditory evoked potential (LLAEP) in adults with WS and compare them with those obtained from neurotypical individuals with no hearing complaints.
Research Design: A cross-sectional observational study with subjects who were submitted to LLAEP assessment with the oddball paradigm and tone-burst stimuli.
Study Sample: A total of 30 individuals of both sexes, aged 18 to 37 years-15 had WS and comprised the study group (SG) and 15 did not have either the syndrome or hearing complaints and comprised the control group (CG); they were matched for sex and age.
Results: The LLAEP analysis showed larger P1-N1 and P2-N2 amplitudes but smaller N2-P3 amplitude in SG, which also had delayed latencies in all components compared with CG.
Conclusion: Adults with WS had increased neuronal response in identifying stimulus characteristics, attentional difficulties in auditory tasks, and deficits in auditory information processing speed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790280 | DOI Listing |
Front Syst Neurosci
December 2024
Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Evoked potentials can be used as an intraoperative monitoring measure in neurological surgery. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), or specifically brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAERs), are known for being minimally affected by anesthetics, while visually evoked potentials (VEPs) are presumed to be unreliable and easily affected by anesthetics. While many anesthesia trials or intraoperative recordings have provided evidence in support of these hypotheses, the comparisons were always made between AEPs and VEPs recorded sequentially, rather than recorded at the same time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Lang
December 2024
Department of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China. Electronic address:
Blind listeners rely more on their auditory skills than the sighted to adapt to unavailable visual information. However, it is still unclear whether the blind has stronger noise-related modulation compared with the sighted when speech is presented under adverse listening conditions. This study aims to address this research gap by constructing noisy conditions and syllable contrasts to obtain auditory middle-latency response (MLR) and long-latency response (LLR) in blind and sighted adults.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Audiol
January 2024
Department of Physical, Speech-Language-Hearing, and Occupational Therapy of the Medical School at the University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: Williams syndrome (WS) is a genetic, multisystemic, neurodevelopmental disorder, in which studies have demonstrated the presence of auditory deficits such as conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, cochlear weakness, and subclinical signs of hearing impairment. However, few studies have assessed this population's central auditory system.
Purpose: To analyze long-latency auditory evoked potential (LLAEP) in adults with WS and compare them with those obtained from neurotypical individuals with no hearing complaints.
J Pediatr (Rio J)
September 2024
Centro de Investigação em Pediatria da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the central auditory system of children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis through behavioral assessment of central auditory processing and electrophysiological tests to investigate short and long-latency auditory potentials, comparing them with the results obtained in the control group.
Methods: 117 from 7 to 21 years old patients were evaluated, 57 of them with cystic fibrosis and 60 of the control group, using behavioral evaluation of central auditory processing, auditory brainstem response and long latency auditory evoked potential. The comparison of the research groups was performed using ANOVA for Auditory Brain Response and P300 responses and Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests for Central Auditory Processing responses.
Psychiatry Res
September 2024
Clinical Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, Western Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Predicting treatment response would facilitate individualized medical treatment in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We examined relationships between auditory-evoked M100 and longitudinal change in positive symptoms in FEP. M100 was measured from source-resolved magnetoencephalography and symptoms were assessed at initial contact and six months later.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!