Comparison of treatment models for single primary advanced gallbladder cancer.

Front Immunol

Department of Anesthesiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: Treatment for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial, with various recommendations regarding the choice and combination of surgery and adjuvant therapy. The present article is targeting for the exploration of optimal treatment models for advanced GBC.

Methods: AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition) stage III and stage IV GBC, were defined as advanced GBC. Patients with advanced GBC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and departmental cohort. Because of the most representative, only gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) patients were selected. Based on their surgical status (No, Non-radical and Radical surgery), chemotherapy status (Chemotherapy, No chemotherapy), and radiotherapy status (Radiotherapy, No radiotherapy), treatment models were categorized. For the purposes of evaluating the treatment outcomes of various treatment models and determining the risk element for cancer-specific survival (CSS), Cox regression analysis was applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were used before and after adjusting for covariates, with log-rank tests used to analyze discrepancies between curves. Immunotherapy was analyzed using clinical data from departmental cohort. Finally, to compensate for the limitations of the database, a review examines the progress in treatment models for advanced GBC.

Results: 5,154 patients aged over 18 years with solitary primary advanced GBC were identified from the SEER database. In advanced GBC patients, the treatment model has emerged as a significant prognostic factor. "Radical surgery + Chemotherapy + Radiotherapy" models maximally improved the CSS of advanced GBC before and after adjusting for covariates, while "No surgery + No chemotherapy + No radiotherapy" model had the lowest CSS. The present conclusions were supported even after subgroup analysis by AJCC stage. The efficacy of immunotherapy was demonstrated in the departmental cohort analysis. Additionally, this article provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in various emerging treatment strategies.

Conclusion: Even when optimal treatment model cannot be pursued, providing comprehensive combinations of treatments to advanced GBC patients whenever possible is always beneficial for their survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599203PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1500091DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advanced gbc
24
treatment models
20
gbc patients
12
departmental cohort
12
surgery chemotherapy
12
advanced
10
treatment
9
primary advanced
8
advanced gallbladder
8
gallbladder cancer
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: CT is the standard of care for patients presenting with unresectable advanced GBC but their prognosis remains poor. The value of consolidation CTRT after initial CT is uncertain. We therefore conducted a single centre open label randomised trial evaluating consolidation CTRT versus Observation after four cycles of CT in patients whose disease did not progress during CT (partial responders/stable disease).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: SWOG S1815 was a randomized, open label phase III trial, evaluating gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), were randomly assigned 2:1 to either GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m, cisplatin 25 mg/m, and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m and cisplatin 25 mg/m intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle).

Results: Among 452 randomly assigned participants, 441 were eligible and analyzable, 67% with ICC, 16% with GBC, and 17% with ECC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of treatment models for single primary advanced gallbladder cancer.

Front Immunol

November 2024

Department of Anesthesiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Article Synopsis
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: to investigate hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) application in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) and compare it to radical cholecystectomy (RC) regarding patients' characteristics, surgical outcome and survival.

Methods: Patients treated in our center were included. Three groups (HPD, RC, no-surgery) were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!