Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic value of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in gastric cancer.
Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included 65 patients with gastric cancer who received both [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging. Histopathological manifestations, typical imaging manifestations, follow-up imaging, and comprehensive clinical assessment were used as reference criteria. The uptakes of [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging techniques.
Results: A total of 65 patients were included (26 male and 39 female; mean age, 54.03 ± 10.41 years), Among them, 10 were newly diagnosed, 46 underwent radical gastrectomy, and 9 received only chemotherapy prior to the study. Compared with [F]FDG PET/CT, [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity in primary or recurrent tumors (100% vs. 64.52%, p < 0.001)), lymph node metastases (88.89% vs. 38.89%, p = 0.006), distant metastases (91.18% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). From the semi-quantitative evaluation, the Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than that of [F]FDG PET/CT in primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases (all p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our study results indicate that [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperforms [F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in gastric cancer.
Key Points: Question Early diagnosis and precise staging of gastric cancer are crucial for patient prognosis; however, current imaging techniques still face significant limitations. Findings [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than [F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary or recurrent tumors and metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical relevance [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an advanced imaging diagnostic technique that significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer and its metastatic lesions. This technology provides robust support for clinical decision-making, thereby improving the management of patients with gastric cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11219-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!