Mechanical studies for the rotational stability of a cemented stem in cases with stem anteversion adjustment in the cement mantle.

J Orthop Sci

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nishinomya Kaisei Hospital, 1-4, Ohama-cho, Nishinomiya City, Hyogo, 662-0957, Japan. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The cemented stem is effective for various femur shapes and maintains stability, although increased cement viscosity during rotation can impact postoperative stability.
  • A study compared two cementing methods—static and rotating stems—using in vitro testing to measure rotational stability under load and repetitive strain.
  • Results showed no significant differences in rotational stability or torque between the static and rotating methods, suggesting that adjusting the stem's version angle before cement hardening does not adversely affect stability.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The cemented stem can accommodate various shapes of femurs and is a stable stem with long-term results. Additionally, the cemented stem is a highly versatile stem that can be used to adjust stem anteversion in patients with variable femoral anteversion. On the other hand, rotating a stem with increasing cement viscosity may result in reduced postoperative rotational stability.

Materials And Methods: Rotational stability was compared using two different cementing techniques via in vitro models. Six stems in Group S (Static) were inserted and fixed until the cement was completely hardened. Six stems in Group R (Rotation) were inserted and then rotated 15° before the cement had fully cured. After the cement had completely set, a static rotation testing was performed in which the stem was rotated at a rate of 1°/sec to 20° while a vertical load of 600 N was applied. For the dynamic testing, a vertical load of 600 N and 10,000 cycles of repetitive rotation were applied at 10° around the stem axis at 0.1 Hz. After 10,000 cycles, maximum torque was compared between Groups S and R.

Results: In both groups, the torque value increased proportionally to the rotation angle. There were no significant differences in resistance to static rotation between Groups S and R (P = 0.599). In the dynamic testing, there was no significant difference between Groups S and R in both minimum torque and maximum torque in any of the cycles. There were no differences in the rotational torque between Groups S and R at 10,000 cycles (P = 0.693).

Conclusions: The rotational stability of the cemented stems did not decrease in vitro when stem version control was performed up to 15° before the cement had completely hardened.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotational stability
12
cemented stem
12
cement completely
12
10000 cycles
12
stem
11
stability cemented
8
stem anteversion
8
stems group
8
completely hardened
8
15° cement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!