Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Contact lens behaviours such as poor hand and lens hygiene are common and are associated with increased risk of microbial keratitis. Evidence for health promotion strategies to address this gap is required. The trial examined the effectiveness of a customised text-messaging intervention on compliance, discontinuation rate and wearer satisfaction in contact lens wearers.
Methods: The parallel group, double masked, randomised clinical trial was pre-registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001719820). Contact lens wearers were recruited using social media and optometry partners in clinical practice. Participants (n = 76) received the intervention and usual care. The control group (n = 75) received usual care. Intervention text messages (range 56-76) were customised, provided education, reminders, and motivation and were delivered over six months. Outcomes were validated self-report online surveys for compliance (0-100), satisfaction (0-100) and discontinuation (Y/N), at 3 months and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were intervention feasibility and acceptability.
Results: Participants mean age was 38 years, 105/151 (70 %) female and 83 % completed the trial (intervention 60/76, control 65/75). The intervention group demonstrated better compliance than control with an adjusted between-group-difference at 3 months of 5.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.6-8.7, P = 0.004 and at 6 months 3.9, 95 % CI 0.2-7.6, P = 0.04. This difference in compliance is clinically significant, equivalent to a single change in a behaviour such as starting to handwash or ceasing overnight wear. There was no adjusted between-group-difference in satisfaction at 3 months (0.8, 95 % CI -4.3-6.0, P = 0.75) or at 6 months (-0.4, 95 % CI -5.7-4.9, P = 0.89). Few participants (7/151, 4.6 %) discontinued contact lens wear (3 intervention, 4 control). The messages were delivered successfully (98 %), at A$11 per participant. Participants reported appropriate message content (75 %), language (80 %) and delivery timing (97 %).
Conclusion: This customised text message intervention was a feasible and acceptable method for improving contact lens compliance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102341 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!