AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to identify and validate transcriptomic signatures for various interstitial lung disease (ILD) subtypes, addressing the issue of limited sample sizes and lack of comparative studies between ILD types.
  • Using patient-level data from 43 transcriptomics studies, the researchers developed classification models by integrating data from 1459 samples, resulting in robust transcriptomic signatures for conditions like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).
  • This work represents the largest meta-analysis of fibrotic ILD transcriptomics, highlighting key gene expression trends that can help differentiate between ILD subtypes and link them to clinical outcomes like lung function deterioration.*

Article Abstract

Objective: Gene expression (transcriptomics) studies have revealed potential mechanisms of interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet sample sizes of studies are often limited and between-subtype comparisons are scarce. The aim of this study was to identify and validate consensus transcriptomic signatures of ILD subtypes.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of fibrotic ILD transcriptomics studies using an individual participant data approach, and included studies examining bulk transcriptomics of human adult ILD samples and excluding those focusing on individual cell populations. Patient-level data and expression matrices were extracted from 43 studies and integrated using a multivariable integrative algorithm to develop ILD classification models.

Results: Using 1459 samples from 24 studies, we identified transcriptomic signatures for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) against control samples, which were validated on 308 samples from 8 studies (area under receiver operating curve [AUC]=0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-1.00], HP AUC=0.91 [0.84-0.99], NSIP AUC=0.94 [0.88-0.99], SSc-ILD AUC=0.98 [0.93-1.00]). Significantly, meta-analysis allowed, for the first time, identification of robust lung transcriptomics signatures to discriminate IPF (AUC=0.71 [0.63-0.79]) and HP (AUC=0.76 [0.63-0.89]) from other fibrotic ILDs, and unsupervised learning algorithms identified putative molecular endotypes of ILD associated with decreased forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (D) % predicted. Transcriptomics signatures were reflective of both cell-specific and disease-specific changes in gene expression.

Conclusion: We present the first systematic review and largest meta-analysis of fibrotic ILD transcriptomics to date, identifying reproducible transcriptomic signatures with clinical relevance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01070-2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
12
transcriptomic signatures
12
interstitial lung
8
lung disease
8
review meta-analysis
8
transcriptomics studies
8
ild
8
meta-analysis fibrotic
8
fibrotic ild
8
ild transcriptomics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!