A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of global cognitive function on the prevalence of fear of falling in older adults. | LitMetric

Effects of global cognitive function on the prevalence of fear of falling in older adults.

J Psychiatr Res

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation, 416 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

This study aimed to investigate the association between global cognitive functioning (GCF) and fear of falling (FOF) in a large population-based sample of adults aged 45 years and older. A total of 2997 and 2012 participants from the original sample were included in the cross-sectional and prospective models, respectively. Participants were re-coded to 'no FOF' and 'FOF' based on their self-reported responses, and those who reported FOF at follow-up were defined as the newly-developed FOF group. GCF was evaluated at baseline and follow-up (2006 and 2020) using the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between GCF at baseline and risk of FOF. In our study, 23.6% (706/2997) of the participants reported FOF at baseline, and 80.3% (1615/2012) reported newly-developed FOF in the follow-up cohort. Importantly, the negative association between GCF and FOF was observed not only in the cross-sectional analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99) but also in the prospective analyses (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). Furthermore, GCF was associated with lower odds of recurrent newly-developed FOF in the stable group than in the original sample (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97 vs OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). Thus, GCF was negatively associated with FOF at baseline and newly-developed FOF in the long-term follow-up cohort, and persistent deficits in GCF may increase the risk of newly-developed FOF. Further research should explore the mechanisms underlying the longitudinal relationship between GCF and newly-developed FOF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.060DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

newly-developed fof
24
fof
12
global cognitive
8
fear falling
8
gcf
8
original sample
8
reported fof
8
fof follow-up
8
association gcf
8
fof baseline
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!