A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of age on hypnotics' efficacy and safety in insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This review compares the effectiveness and safety of sleep medications (hypnotics) in older adults (65+) versus younger adults (<65) for improving sleep quality and overall safety.
  • - Out of 70 clinical trials analyzed with nearly 18,000 participants, older adults had a smaller improvement in sleep quality and lower tolerance for medications compared to younger adults.
  • - The study suggests that some hypnotics may be less effective for seniors and emphasizes the need for future research to consider factors like multiple health issues and multiple medications in older populations.

Article Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy in improving sleep quality and safety of hypnotics in individuals aged 65 years or older compared to those under 65 years.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBM Reviews were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing hypnotics to the placebo in adults with chronic insomnia between Jan 2000 and Dec 2022. The efficacy outcome included all participant self-assessments sleep quality questionnaires. The safety outcome included acceptability and tolerance. Standardized mean differences (SMD) was estimated using a random effect model.

Results: We included 17 and 53 clinical trials with 3688 and 14,720 participants in the ≥65 years and <65 years group respectively. The SMD for the sleep quality outcome was -0.36 [Confidence interval (CI) 95 %: 0.45;-0.26] in the ≥65 years group compared to -0.51 [95%CI: 0.61; -0.41] in the <65 years group (p = 0.02). Differences in efficacy were observed between pharmacological classes. The overall SMD for the tolerance outcome was - 0.25 [95%CI: 0.34; -0.16] favoring the placebo group (p < 0.001). In the ≥65 years group the SMD was -0.07 [95%CI: 0.21; 0.08] compared to -0.31 [95%CI: 0.41; -0.21] in the <65 years group (p = 0.01). There were no differences for acceptability.

Conclusion: We found that some hypnotics classes could be less effective in older individuals. We encourage authors to include details on multimorbidity and polypharmacy in their publications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2024.11.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
sleep quality
8
clinical trials
8
outcome included
8
age hypnotics'
4
hypnotics' efficacy
4
efficacy safety
4
safety insomnia
4
insomnia systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!