Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chin Med J (Engl)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy (Chemo) offers superior progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR) for first-line treatment in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC), without increasing treatment-related adverse events (AEs).
  • In subsequent-line treatment with ICIs alone, patients showed a median PFS of 4.12 months and an ORR of 24%, but the efficacy was significantly lower compared to chemotherapy.
  • The study found that neither PD-L1 expression nor other factors predicted the effectiveness of the ICI + Chemo combination over chemotherapy alone, suggesting that the survival benefits are independent of these markers.

Article Abstract

Background: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo) shows promise in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC), but some patients experience limited benefit and survival predictors remain unclear. Furthermore, ICIs efficacy in subsequent treatments needs further evaluation.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings was conducted to identify studies for meta-analysis. The objective was to compare ICI + Chemo with chemotherapy in first-line treatment and identify efficacy predictors, and to evaluate ICIs alone in subsequent-line treatment for RM-NPC, with a focus on progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

Results: Fifteen trials involving 1928 patients were included. Three trials compared ICI + Chemo with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, while 12 trials evaluated ICIs alone in subsequent-line treatment of RM-NPC patients. First-line ICI + Chemo showed superior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.63; P <0.001) and ORR (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14, 95% CI, 1.05-1.24; P <0.001) compared to chemotherapy, without increased AEs (RR = 1.01, 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P  = 0.481). Neither programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) nor other factors predicted the efficacy of ICI + Chemo vs . chemotherapy. Subsequent-line ICIs alone had a median PFS of 4.12 months (95% CI, 2.93-5.31 months), an ORR of 24% (95% CI, 20-28%), with grade 1-5/grade 3-5 AEs at 79%/14%. However, ICIs alone were associated with significantly shorter PFS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI, 1.01-1.68; P  = 0.040) than chemotherapy alone.

Conclusions: ICI + Chemo confers superior survival benefits compared to chemotherapy in first-line RM-NPC treatment, independent of PD-L1 expression or other factors. However, ICIs alone demonstrate a manageable safety profile but do not surpass chemotherapy in efficacy for subsequent-line treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003371DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ici chemo
16
immune checkpoint
8
checkpoint inhibitors
8
recurrent metastatic
8
metastatic nasopharyngeal
8
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
8
rm-npc patients
8
chemo chemotherapy
8
chemotherapy first-line
8
first-line treatment
8

Similar Publications

Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare disease which is mostly diagnosed late due to symptoms caused by its local invasion to the urinary bladder. Given the lack of clinical trials and guideline recommendations for systemic treatment, a molecularly informed precision oncology approach is a viable option for UrC already in the early lines of systemic treatment. While single case experiences may provide valuable reference for later decision-making, well-documented clinical experience with off-label targeted treatments is limited to a few patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of systemic cancer therapy. During disinhibiting the antitumor responses of immune system, ICIs may also cause unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which could affect any organ. Here, we report a rare case of sintilimab-induced ureteritis/cystitis in a 55-year-old male undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for gastric cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes approximately 80-85% of cancer-related fatalities globally, and direct and indirect comparisons of various therapies for NSCLC are lacking. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC.

Methods: The electronic databases were systematically searched from inception until March 18, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 71-year-old male ex-smoker presented in October 2021 to our department with a brain and bone metastatic adenocarcinoma NSCLC. PDL1, ROS, EGFR, and ALK were negative. He underwent stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens compared with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Method: A comprehensive search was performed in four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens for advanced or metastatic UC. The search encompassed the time span from the inception of the databases to April 23, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!