AI Article Synopsis

  • - Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious complication that can occur after carotid artery stenting (CAS), primarily in normotensive patients, and is linked to factors like recent carotid stenosis and hemodynamic instability.
  • - A systematic literature review revealed a CHS prevalence of 1.2% after CAS and highlighted that while some risk factors are identified, isolated hypotension has not been conclusively linked to CHS development.
  • - Although mortality rates from intracranial hemorrhage post-CAS can be high, cases of CHS generally have a better prognosis, suggesting that a more nuanced understanding and further research are necessary for effective diagnosis and management.

Article Abstract

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious post-procedural complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The pathophysiological mechanisms of CHS in the absence of arterial hypertension (AH) remain only partially understood. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using the terms »cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome«, »hypotension«, »hyperperfusion«, »stroke«, »intracranial hemorrhages«, »risk factors«, »carotid revascularization«, »carotid stenting«, »carotid endarterectomy«, »blood-brain barrier«, »endothelium«, »contrast encephalopathy«, and combinations. We present a case of a normotensive female patient who developed CHS post-CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis while being hypotensive with complete recovery. We identified 393 papers, among which 65 were deemed relevant to the topic. The weighted average prevalence of CHS after CAS is 1.2% [0.0-37.7%] with that of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being 0.51% [0-9.3%]. Recently symptomatic carotid stenosis or contralateral carotid revascularization, urgent intervention, acute carotid occlusion, contralateral ≥70% stenosis, and the presence of leptomeningeal collaterals were associated with CHS. A prolonged hemodynamic instability after CAS conveys a higher risk for CHS. However, none of the articles mentioned isolated hypotension as a risk factor for CHS. Whereas mortality after ICH post-CAS ranges from 40 to 75%, in the absence of ICH, CHS generally carries a good prognosis. AH is not obligatory in CHS development. Even though impaired cerebral autoregulation and post-revascularization changes in cerebral hemodynamics seem to play a pivotal role in CHS pathophysiology, our case highlights the complexity of CHS, involving factors like endothelial dysfunction and sudden reperfusion. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and management approaches for this condition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595517PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life14111472DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chs
11
artery stenting
8
hyperperfusion syndrome
8
symptomatic carotid
8
carotid stenosis
8
carotid
5
post-carotid artery
4
stenting hyperperfusion
4
syndrome hypotensive
4
hypotensive patient
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!