To compare post-operative bleeding measures in patients who underwent prostatic artery embolization (PAE) prior to water-jet ablation (aquablation) vs. water-jet ablation alone. A retrospective review identified 145 patients treated with water-jet ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia from December 2018 to June 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: water-jet ablation alone (n = 56) vs. pre-operative PAE and water-jet ablation (n = 89). Patient demographics, pertinent laboratory values, operative reports, and hospital courses were reviewed. PAE was technically successful in all patients (n = 89), and all 89 patients underwent successful water-jet ablation within a median time of 2 days. Compared to water-jet ablation alone, pre-operative PAE resulted in a significant reduction in post-operative bleeding as measured via lower rates of continuous bladder irrigation, hemostatic measures, and hematuria. Pre-operative PAE was also associated with lower rates of post-operative urinary retention (odds ratio 17, = 0.02) and less likely to require reoperation 30 days after the procedure ( = 0.003). There were no major PAE-related adverse events reported in the combination arm. Compared to water-jet ablation alone, pre-operative PAE resulted in fewer bleeding-related complications and urinary retention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594930PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226930DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

water-jet ablation
36
pre-operative pae
16
ablation pre-operative
12
water-jet
9
ablation
9
prostatic artery
8
artery embolization
8
prior water-jet
8
ablation aquablation
8
benign prostatic
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Water Jet Ablation Therapy (WJAT) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) represent two common surgical treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Despite their increasing use, there is no study between these two methods. We aim to evaluate their efficacy and safety through a network meta-analysis (NMA), providing critical insights for clinical decision-making in the management of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Morphological changes in the prostatic urethra and bladder cavity resulting from Aquablation treatment are still unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of Aquablation within one-year post-surgery, focusing on both functional and endoscopic outcomes.

Methods: Prospective enrollment of patients undergoing Aquablation (10/2018-04/2023) included those with baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 10, prostate volume from 40 to 80 mL, and Qmax ≤ 12 mL/s.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To compare post-operative bleeding measures in patients who underwent prostatic artery embolization (PAE) prior to water-jet ablation (aquablation) vs. water-jet ablation alone. A retrospective review identified 145 patients treated with water-jet ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia from December 2018 to June 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[AQUABLATION OF THE PROSTATE - A NOVEL ROBOTIC PROCEDURE FOR THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA].

Harefuah

July 2024

Department of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Article Synopsis
  • Aquablation is a new robotic-assisted procedure using ultrasound and water jets to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), aiming to assess its efficiency and safety.
  • A retrospective analysis of 50 patients revealed successful surgeries with no intra-operative complications, a median surgery time of 51 minutes, and minimal change in hemoglobin levels.
  • The procedure led to a significant improvement in urinary symptoms and quality of life, with most patients showing stable functional outcomes and none reporting significant urinary incontinence post-surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: Aquablation is included in the European Association Urology guidelines as an alternative surgical technique for prostate resection. The evidence summary states that it is subjectively and objectively as effective as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and enucleation, but concerns remain regarding postoperative bleeding. Our aim was to provide an evidence-based overview of the trials, triumphs, and technical challenges of Aquablation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!