A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluating the Effect of Image Enhancement on Diagnostic Reliability in Dry Eye Disease Using a Portable Imaging Device. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study evaluated how image enhancement techniques impact the reliability of diagnosing dry eye conditions using a portable device called the Smart Eye Camera (SEC).
  • - Analysis of video recordings from 46 patients revealed that certain levels of enhancement led to better consistency in assessments, particularly for corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) and tear break-up time (TBUT).
  • - While moderate enhancement improved diagnostic accuracy, excessive enhancement negatively affected the reliability of other assessments, suggesting the need for careful calibration of image processing.

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of image enhancement techniques on the interobserver reliability of tear break-up time (TBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) scoring, and conjunctivochalasis detection using the Smart Eye Camera (SEC), a portable device for anterior segment examination.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on video recordings captured by the SEC from 46 patients with dry eye disease (DED). Separate sets of images were created for each level of enhancement: unenhanced (G0), mildly enhanced (G3), and strongly enhanced (G7). These sets were not intermixed, ensuring that each enhancement level was assessed independently. Three observers-two DED specialists and one general ophthalmologist-assessed TBUT, TMH, CFS scores, and conjunctivochalasis. Interobserver reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for each image set.

Results: Interobserver reliability for CFS scores significantly improved with G3, yielding an ICC of 0.8413. In contrast, G7 improved reliability for TBUT measurements (ICC = 0.7381), but led to a notable decrease in reliability for both CFS scoring (ICC = 0.2259) and conjunctivochalasis detection (ICC = 0.0786). Furthermore, the assessment of TMH demonstrated a progressive decline in accuracy with increasing levels of image enhancement.

Conclusions: Image enhancement using the SEC improved the diagnostic consistency of dry eye specialists and general ophthalmologists, especially for TBUT and CFS assessments. However, excessive enhancement may obscure key diagnostic features, indicating the need for careful optimization of image processing techniques depending on the diagnostic focus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592944PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image enhancement
12
dry eye
12
interobserver reliability
12
eye disease
8
cfs scoring
8
conjunctivochalasis detection
8
specialists general
8
cfs scores
8
reliability cfs
8
enhancement
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!