Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The evolution of embolic agents necessitates the use of microcatheters compatible with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), with detachable tip microcatheters (DTMs) emerging as a significant innovation aimed at reducing the risk of catheter entrapment in embolization procedures. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and DMSO compatibility of DTMs with non-detachable tip microcatheters (Non-DTMs) in the context of embolization treatments for neurovascular diseases.
Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases until February 25, 2024. Primary outcomes included technical success and microcatheter-related complications, with a meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model to calculate proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (Cl).
Results: Forty-five studies involving 2185 patients and 3758 catheters (995 DTMs and 2763 Non-DTMs) were analyzed. Our analysis revealed that DTMs were associated with comparable rates of technical success (98.3 % vs. 97.6 %, p = 0.68), favorable outcomes (93.9 % vs. 93.6 %, p = 0.89), and microcatheter-related complications compared to Non-DTMs. Specifically, DTMs showed a 0.0 % rate of microcatheter entrapment and hemorrhagic complications. Intended detachment was achieved in 41.7 % (95 % CI = 27.02-57.98) of cases and premature detachment was rare (0.1 %; 95 % %CI = 0.00-1.23). In the analysis of comparative studies, microcatheter-related complications did not defer between DTM and Non-DTM groups.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of DTMs in embolization treatments, emphasizing their compatibility with DMSO-based embolic agents and their potential to enhance patient outcomes in neurointerventional procedures. Future research should focus on well-designed, larger, prospective, comparative multi-center studies to strengthen the evidence base and further optimize the use of DTMs in endovascular interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2024.101234 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!