AI Article Synopsis

  • - The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was created from 2021-23 to provide timely research evidence to inform health and social care decisions amidst the fast-paced challenges of the pandemic.
  • - The WCEC employed flexible knowledge mobilisation methods, including stakeholder co-production and public engagement, to ensure that relevant findings reached the right decision-makers effectively.
  • - Results showed that WCEC's processes successfully facilitated the use of rapid evidence reviews, although realizing public benefits from this work will require additional time and resources.

Article Abstract

Background: The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021-23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time.

Aims And Objectives: To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned.

Methods: Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders' needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey.

Results: Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC's rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this 'pathway to impact' work will take further time and resources.

Discussion And Conclusion: The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594520PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314461PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knowledge mobilisation
28
rapid evidence
20
policy practice
20
mobilisation processes
16
evidence
12
evidence reviews
12
practice decision-makers
12
evidence review
12
reviews inform
8
inform health
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!