Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}.

Trials

Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Dahua Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This clinical study compares the effectiveness and safety of two lasers, the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (HO:YAG) and the superpulse thulium fiber laser (SP TFL), in treating kidney stones via ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy.
  • - Patients will be randomly assigned to receive treatment with either laser, with outcomes measured for stone elimination and various surgical performance indicators 30 days post-operation.
  • - The study is registered under ChiCTR2300076893 and aims to provide insights on whether the newer SP TFL can serve as a better alternative to the established HO:YAG laser.

Article Abstract

Background: Kidney stone disease is a common problem. The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (HO:YAG) laser is currently the gold standard laser for ureterorenoscopic (URS) lithotripsy. Recently, the superpulse thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) has shown potential as a substitute for the HO:YAG laser. We aim to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the HO:YAG laser and SP TFL in the treatment of upper urinary calculi in this trial.

Methods: In this randomized, positive control, blinded management, single-center clinical study, patients with upper urinary calculi will be randomized (1:1) to the experimental group (SP TFL group) or the control group (HO:YAG laser group). Patients in both groups will undergo URS lithotripsy under general anesthesia, and according to the results of randomization, the patients will be treated with an SP TFL (trial group) or a holmium laser (control group). The primary outcome is the stone-free rate at 30 ± 7 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes include the duration of surgery, the duration of laser use, the length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative clinical indicators, total hospitalization costs, the second-stage stone clearance rate, perioperative complications, the average hemoglobin change, and the mean white blood cell count change.

Discussion: This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the SP TFL and HO:YAG for URS lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary calculi. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A AND 2B}: chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300076893. Registered on October 24, 2023, with ChiCTR ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=206827 ). PROTOCOL VERSION {3}: August 15, 2023 (V.20230815).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587615PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08362-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper urinary
16
hoyag laser
16
clinical efficacy
12
efficacy safety
12
treatment upper
12
urs lithotripsy
12
urinary calculi
12
laser
10
superpulse thulium
8
thulium fiber
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!