AI Article Synopsis

  • Surgeons can enhance patient safety by monitoring surgical outcomes using statistical process control tools, which have adapted from the manufacturing industry to healthcare.
  • * Identifying the right tool is essential; an observed minus expected (O-E) chart is easy to use but may lack depth, while a cumulative sum (CUSUM) method is more complex and requires statistical training.
  • * A new risk-adjusted O-E CUSUM chart combines the ease of the O-E chart with the detailed analysis of CUSUM, allowing surgeons to track outcomes effectively and make data-driven improvements to patient safety.

Article Abstract

To improve patient safety, surgeons can continually monitor the surgical outcomes of their patients. To this end, they can use statistical process control tools, which primarily originated in the manufacturing industry and are now widely used in healthcare. These tools belong to a broad family, making it challenging to identify the most suitable methodology to monitor surgical outcomes. The selected tools must balance statistical rigour with surgeon usability, enabling both statistical interpretation of trends over time and comprehensibility for the surgeons, their primary users. On one hand, the observed minus expected (O-E) chart is a simple and intuitive tool that allows surgeons without statistical expertise to view and interpret their activity; however, it may not possess the sophisticated algorithms required to accurately identify important changes in surgical performance. On the other hand, a statistically robust tool like the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method can be helpful but may be too complex for surgeons to interpret and apply in practice without proper statistical training. To address this issue, we developed a new risk-adjusted (RA) O-E CUSUM chart that aims to provide a balanced solution, integrating the visualisation strengths of a user-friendly O-E chart with the statistical interpretation capabilities of a CUSUM chart. With the RA O-E CUSUM chart, surgeons can effectively monitor patients' outcomes and identify sequences of statistically abnormal changes, indicating either deterioration or improvement in surgical outcomes. They can also quantify potentially preventable or avoidable adverse events during these sequences. Subsequently, surgical teams can try implementing changes to potentially improve their performance and enhance patient safety over time. This paper outlines the methodology for building the tool and provides a concrete example using real surgical data to demonstrate its application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017935DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cusum chart
16
surgical outcomes
16
o-e cusum
12
observed minus
8
minus expected
8
cumulative sum
8
patient safety
8
monitor surgical
8
statistical interpretation
8
o-e chart
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!