Importance: Biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) receive 12 years of guaranteed protection from biosimilar competition compared with 5 years of protection from generic competition for new small-molecule drugs. Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, biologics are exempt from selection for Medicare price negotiation for 11 years compared with 7 years for small-molecule drugs. Congress codified these differing legal protections on the premise that biologics require more time and resources to develop and have weaker patent protection, necessitating additional protections for manufacturers to recoup their development costs and generate adequate returns on investment.

Objective: To review empirical evidence from the US experience with biologics to analyze the assumptions underlying longer periods of market exclusivity and protection from price negotiation compared with small-molecule drugs.

Evidence Review: Recent data on development times, clinical trial success rates, research and development costs, patent protection, market exclusivity periods, revenues, and treatment costs of biologics vs small-molecule drugs were analyzed.

Findings: The FDA approved 599 new therapeutic agents from 2009-2023, of which 159 (27%) were biologics and 440 (73%) were small-molecule drugs. Median development times were 12.6 years (IQR, 10.6-15.3 years) for biologics vs 12.7 years (IQR, 10.2-15.5 years) for small-molecule drugs (P = .76). Biologics had higher clinical trial success rates at every phase of development. Median development costs were estimated to be $3.0 billion (IQR, $1.3 billion-$5.5 billion) for biologics and $2.1 billion (IQR, $1.3 billion-$3.7 billion) for small-molecule drugs (P = .39). Biologics were protected by a median of 14 patents (IQR, 5-24 patents) compared with 3 patents (IQR, 2-5 patents) for small-molecule drugs (P < .001). The median time to biosimilar competition was 20.3 years (IQR, 16.9-21.7 years) compared with 12.6 years (IQR, 12.5-13.5 years) for small-molecule drugs. Biologics achieved higher median peak revenues ($1.1 billion in year 13; IQR, $0.5 billion-$2.9 billion) than small-molecule drugs ($0.5 billion in year 8; IQR, $0.1 billion-$1.2 billion; P = .01) and had higher median revenues in each year following FDA approval. The median annual cost of treatment was $92 000 (IQR, $31 000-$357 000) for biologics and $33 000 (IQR, $4000-$177 000) for small-molecule drugs (P = .005).

Conclusions And Relevance: There is little evidence to support biologics having longer periods of market exclusivity or protection from negotiation. As a result of differential treatment, US law appears to overly reward the development of biologics relative to small-molecule drugs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.16911DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small-molecule drugs
32
development costs
12
biologics
11
small-molecule
9
legal protections
8
biologics small-molecule
8
drugs
8
years
8
compared years
8
price negotiation
8

Similar Publications

A patent review of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (2021-present).

Expert Opin Ther Pat

December 2024

Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drugs Design & Discovery of Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.

Introduction: Xanthine oxidase (XO) catalyzes the oxidation of both hypoxanthine and xanthine in the last two steps of the purine metabolic pathway, serving as a rate-limiting enzyme for uric acid production as well as a key target for the treatment of gout and other hyperuricemia-related conditions.

Areas Covered: This paper reviews XO inhibitors in patents from 2021 to the present. We summarize in detail the structural classes and characteristics, in vitro and in vivo biological results, and structure‒activity relationships of synthetic inhibitors, as well as the sources, specific structures, research methods, and biological activities of XO inhibitors from natural products.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanisms of Low MHC I Expression and Strategies for Targeting MHC I with Small Molecules in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Cancer Lett

December 2024

Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310015, China; The Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310018, China. Electronic address:

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I load antigens and present them on the cell surface, which transduces the tumor-associated antigens to CD8 T cells, activating the acquired immune system. However, many tumors downregulate MHC I expression to evade immune surveillance. The low expression of MHC I not only reduce recognition by- and cytotoxicity of CD8 T cells, but also seriously weakens the anti-tumor effect of immunotherapy by restoring CD8 T cells, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Identifying target proteins for bioactive molecules is essential for understanding their mechanisms, developing improved derivatives, and minimizing off-target effects. Despite advances in target identification (target-ID) technologies, significant challenges remain, impeding drug development. Most target-ID methods use cell lysates, but maintaining an intact cellular context is vital for capturing specific drug-protein interactions, such as those with transient protein complexes and membrane-associated proteins.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) plays a crucial role in the detoxification of thiopurine drugs, including the antimetabolites azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) used to treat autoimmune diseases and various cancers. These drugs interfere with DNA synthesis by inhibiting the production of purine-containing nucleotides, leading to the death of rapidly dividing cells. TPMT inactivates thiopurine drugs by methylating at the thiol group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the association between smoking, genetic susceptibility and early menopause (EM) and clarify the potential mechanisms underlying this relationship.

Design: An observational and Transcriptome-wide association analysis (TWAS) study.

Setting: UK Biobank and public summary statistics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!