With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!