A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Latency and amplitude of catch-up saccades to accelerating targets. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Humans use smooth pursuit and saccades to track moving targets, with catch-up saccades correcting tracking errors.
  • The study examined how retinal acceleration error impacts saccade latency and amplitude during target pursuit.
  • Findings indicate that retinal acceleration error significantly predicts saccade parameters, suggesting it helps in estimating future target positions along with position and velocity errors.

Article Abstract

To track moving targets, humans move their eyes using both saccades and smooth pursuit. If pursuit eye movements fail to accurately track the moving target, catch-up saccades are initiated to rectify the tracking error. It is well known that retinal position and velocity errors determine saccade latency and amplitude, but the extent to which retinal acceleration error influences these aspects is not well quantified. To test this, 13 adult human participants performed an experiment where they pursued accelerating/decelerating targets. During the ongoing pursuit, we introduced a randomly sized target step to evoke a catch-up saccade and analyzed its latency and amplitude. We observed that retinal acceleration error (computed over a 200 ms range centered 100 ms before the saccade) was a statistically significant predictor of saccade amplitude and latency. A multiple linear regression supported our hypothesis that retinal acceleration errors influence saccade amplitude in addition to the influence of retinal position and velocity errors. We also found that saccade latencies were shorter when retinal acceleration error increased the tracking error and vice versa. In summary, our findings support a model in which retinal acceleration error is used to compute a predicted position error ∼100 ms into the future to trigger saccades and determine saccade amplitude. When visually tracking object motion, humans combine smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements to maintain the target image on the fovea. Retinal position and velocity errors are known to determine catch-up saccade amplitude and latency, however, it is unknown if retinal acceleration error is also used to predict future target position. This study provides evidence of a small but statistically significant contribution of retinal acceleration error in determining saccade amplitude and latency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00123.2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retinal acceleration
28
acceleration error
24
saccade amplitude
20
latency amplitude
12
retinal position
12
position velocity
12
velocity errors
12
amplitude latency
12
retinal
10
error
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!