Background: Previous results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve the response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC.
Methods: Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II-IVA ESCC were randomly assigned to receive IC followed by CRT or CRT alone. The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed. Baseline tumor biopsies were collected for RNA-Seq to identify patients who may benefit from IC.
Results: Eligible patients were randomized to either the IC + CRT group (n = 55) or the CRT group (n = 55). With a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 31.8% in the IC + CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P =.675; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58-1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year progression-free survival between groups (30.5% vs 25.5%, P =.508; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. A risk-score model incorporating 6 key genes to predict IC efficacy was also constructed.
Conclusions: Compared with definitive CRT alone, the addition of IC before CRT still failed to demonstrate superior survival in patients with unselected ESCC, based on long-term follow-up. However, because IC responders were associated with more favorable survival, potential molecular biomarkers were identified for selection of benefit population from IC.
Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02403531.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae295 | DOI Listing |
Microbiol Spectr
January 2025
Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the malignant tumors globally, with high morbidity and mortality rates. The mainstay treatment of CRC includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, these treatments are associated with a high recurrence rate, poor prognosis, and highly toxic side effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLeuk Lymphoma
January 2025
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Using immunotherapeutic agents like inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), blinatumomab, or chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T)-cell therapy in frontline adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) therapy is promising. These agents are mostly well tolerated and have different toxicity profiles than conventional chemotherapy, enabling their combination with chemotherapy. Additionally, they have often been shown to overcome the traditional adverse ALL risk features.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Healthc Mater
January 2025
School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China.
Sonodynamic therapy (SDT), which is non-invasive and controllable has the potential to treat triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the hypoxia and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) often block the production of reactive oxygen species and the induction of SDT-activated immunogenic cell death, thus limiting the activation of adaptive immune responses. To alleviate these challenges, we proposed the development of a multifunctional biomimetic nanoplatform (mTSeIR), which was designed with diselenide-conjugated sonosensitizers and tirapazamine (TPZ), encapsulated within M1 macrophage membrane.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBlood
December 2024
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States.
We evaluated the prognostic and therapeutic significance of measurable residual disease (MRD) during remission induction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. In the CCCG-ALL-2015 protocol, 7640 patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups based on clinical and genetic features. Final risk classification was determined by MRD assessed via flow cytometry on Days 19 and 46 of remission induction, with additional intensified chemotherapy for Day 19 MRD ≥1%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!