A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Same same but different: Introduction of a classification system in calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty. | LitMetric

Background: The concept of calcar-guided short-stem THA (ssTHA) has largely emerged over the last decade, especially in Europe, and today modern calcar-guided short stems are among the most successful primary femoral implants in terms of complications and revision rates as indicated by multiple registry data. The philosophy originally comprised an individualised reconstruction of the hip anatomy by following the calcar of the femoral neck providing bone- and soft-tissue-sparing characteristics. However, as the stem design allows either metaphyseal fixation alone or additional diaphyseal anchoring, depending on the stem alignment and indication, distinct knowledge is required regarding the implantation technique, the broad variation of positioning and fixation and its potential clinical consequences.

Aim: To report on and highlight the characteristics of different ways of performing calcar-guided ssTHA as well as to introduce a classification in order to systematically account for the variety of strategies and the respective implications on the type of fixation.

Surgical Technique: Already when templating preoperatively, surgeons need to weigh up the different fixation types taking into account a number of patient-related factors. Intraoperatively, by individually controlling the level of osteotomy, the intended type of anchorage can be implemented. Intraoperative radiography to confirm the result, is mandatory.

Results: Despite numerous options of stem alignment, depending on the patient's anatomy, the bone quality or the indication for operation, a total of 4 categories were identified to characterise different fixation strategies in calcar-guided ssTHA.

Conclusions: The classification system should be used for the preoperative determination of the intended type of anchorage. Whenever a short-stem philosophy with metaphyseal fixation (Type I (M)) is possible, it should be pursued.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000241286259DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667953PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

classification system
8
calcar-guided short-stem
8
metaphyseal fixation
8
stem alignment
8
intended type
8
type anchorage
8
calcar-guided
5
fixation
5
introduction classification
4
system calcar-guided
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!