AI Article Synopsis

  • - Bone mineral density (BMD) is important for diagnosing osteoporosis, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a new, fast, and safe method for its assessment.
  • - A study involving 318 healthy adults in Taiwan compared BIA measurements of whole-body BMD with the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method, finding a correlation but significant differences in results.
  • - While BIA shows potential for convenient BMD screening, its accuracy and reliability need further improvement, as there remains a notable bias when compared to the DXA standard.

Article Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586393PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

x-ray absorptiometry
12
correlation coefficient
12
bone mineral
8
mineral density
8
bioelectrical impedance
8
impedance analysis
8
bmd measurement
8
dual-energy x-ray
8
whole-body bmd
8
regression equation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!