A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study. | LitMetric

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally and is predominantly associated with a cluster of lifestyle risk factors. Mobile health (mHealth) apps offer the potential to overcome traditional barriers by supporting healthy lifestyle behaviours. However, knowledge about perceptions of mHealth lifestyle apps among healthcare professionals and people with CVD is sparse. This study examined barriers and facilitators of using the mHealth apps for healthy lifestyle support among healthcare professionals and CVD patients.

Methods: We conducted an in-depth qualitative study employing individual semi-structured interviews with 8 CVD healthcare professionals and 4 patients with CVD in Australia. Participants were asked open-ended questions about their perceptions and experiences with mHealth lifestyle apps. A thematic analysis approach was used to establish perceived barriers and facilitators for mHealth lifestyle apps.

Results: Most participants perceived mHealth lifestyle apps as useful. The key perceptions of facilitators included features for tailoring to personal needs, low costs and wide availability of the apps and addressing barriers to use like reminders. Both healthcare professionals and patients identified the strengths and weaknesses regarding the usefulness of mHealth lifestyle apps. Healthcare professionals and patients perceived several barriers to mHealth app use including trustworthiness, scientific validity, language barriers, the capability of using an app or digital literacy, costs for some commercial apps, and accessibility of an app for low-income groups.

Conclusion: Lifestyle apps provide an opportunity for better patient and healthcare professional communications, however, several barriers including improving digital health literacy and scientific validations of the apps are required before being recommended in clinical practice. Findings from this study can inform potential mHealth lifestyle app design to meet the demands of users. Addressing these barriers effectively can enhance the adoption and efficacy of mHealth apps, ultimately contributing to improved CVD management and healthier lifestyle behaviours.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105706DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mhealth lifestyle
28
healthcare professionals
24
lifestyle apps
24
professionals patients
16
lifestyle
12
apps
12
mhealth apps
12
mhealth
11
qualitative study
8
barriers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!