Enhanced petrophysical evaluation through machine learning and well logging data in an Iranian oil field.

Sci Rep

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, 75169-13817, Iran.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Reservoir petrophysical assessments are crucial for determining hydrocarbon reserves and characterizing reservoir layers through advanced logging technology that measures essential parameters like porosity and rock properties.
  • This study evaluates a specific reservoir, identifying productive zones by analyzing well logging data and applying various machine learning methods to model water saturation.
  • The AdaBoost model outperformed others in estimating water saturation with low error rates, while the GP model also showed good accuracy, highlighting the effectiveness of machine learning in petrophysical evaluations.

Article Abstract

Reservoir petrophysical assessments are essential for determining hydrocarbon reserves, production, and characterizing reservoir layers. Advanced logging technology identifies crucial petrophysical parameters, including porosity type, rock pore size and type, and static/dynamic properties. The aim of this study is to present a petrophysical evaluation of the studied reservoir and to identify the reservoir layers by calculating and determining petrophysical indicators using well logging data. Additionally, various machine learning methods, including Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, Extreme Learning Machine, Multi Gene Genetic Programming, Decision Tree, and Adaptive Boosting, were compared to model the water saturation data according to different logs. The investigated depth ranged from 4050.6 to 4560 m, with each image containing over 3000 data at the desired depth. The main lithology of the formation was limestone with some shale. By conducting a petrophysical evaluation and applying parameter cutoffs, productive zones within the reservoir were identified. Layer 3 had the highest average net porosity (18%) and net water saturation (17%), with secondary porosity observed in most layers. Among the machine learning models tested the AdaBoost model demonstrated the lowest error value for estimating water saturation, with an RMSE of 0.0152 and an AARE% of 3.1610, establishing it as the most effective model in this study. Furthermore, the GP model provided a correlation between the input parameters and predicted water saturation, demonstrating good accuracy with an RMSE of 0.0231 and an AARE of 4.3597.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584839PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80362-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

water saturation
16
petrophysical evaluation
12
machine learning
12
well logging
8
logging data
8
reservoir layers
8
reservoir
5
petrophysical
5
enhanced petrophysical
4
machine
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!