Evidence-Based Guidelines for Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery.

Ophthalmology

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Lanzhou University Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Center, Lanzhou, China.

Published: November 2024

Topic: Development of evidence-based guidelines for keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx).

Clinical Relevance: Keratorefractive lenticule extraction refers to various corneal refractive procedures involving removal of refractive lenticules of intrastromal corneal tissue, typically through a small incision, eliminating creation of a corneal flap. This technique has gained popularity rapidly; however, no clinical practice guidelines exist.

Methods: These evidence-based guidelines were developed following the World Health Organization guidebook using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool and adhering to the Reporting Items for Practice Guideline in Healthcare statement. The body of evidence was drawn from 8 literature databases, 5 clinical guideline databases, and 2 academic organizations. Recommendations were developed via a Delphi consensus of 44 global experts in refractive surgery, cornea, retina, glaucoma, and optometry. The certainty of evidence, balance of benefits and harms, patient preferences and values, and economic evaluations were considered fully. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strengths.

Results: From 385 initial clinical questions, 15 were identified, prompting a review of 250 717 studies, with 609 included for conducting and updating 26 and 2 systematic reviews, respectively. Subsequently, consensus was reached on 38 recommendations for preoperative screening, candidate selection, intraoperative quality control, operating principles, postoperative monitoring, and complication management. For KLEx, an effective and accurate refractive correction is attributed to various factors such as corneal thickness, degree of myopia, treatment nomogram, and optical zone. For complications that could affect vision, comprehensive and effective management strategies were proposed, particularly for wrong-plane dissection and difficult lenticule removal, suction loss, and perioperative infection. Customized surgical planning protocols and operative techniques were analyzed. Among all recommendations, 29 (76%) were labelled as strong, each externally reviewed. The corneal biomechanical properties may help to improve safety and predictability, although they need further validation. Several research gaps for enhancing KLEx safety were also revealed.

Conclusions: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for KLEx in clinical practice, such as for preoperative screening for keratoconus, surgical planning, and management and prevention of complications and infection. The guidelines are expected to minimize the complications and achieve better outcomes.

Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.11.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evidence-based guidelines
12
keratorefractive lenticule
12
lenticule extraction
12
guidelines keratorefractive
8
clinical practice
8
preoperative screening
8
surgical planning
8
guidelines
6
corneal
5
recommendations
5

Similar Publications

Aim(s): To investigate the impact of the absence of specific advice for oral fluid intake, compared to supplementation water intake on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache.

Design: A prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, multicenter trial including hospitalized patients requiring a diagnostic lumbar puncture in seven hospitals in France.

Methods: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) either to receive no specific advice on oral fluid intake (FREE-FLUID), or to be encouraged to drink 2 liters of water (CONTROL) within the 2 hours after lumbar puncture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In Germany, the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury is approximately 16 per million inhabitants per year. This article aims to present evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic measures for the first 14 days after injury to minimize neural damage, prevent complications, and preserve functioning as much as possible.

Methods: After the formulation of key questions, systematic literature searches were carried out on multiple topics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess if implementing interventions to effectively manage preoperative chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR) can improve shoulder surgery outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA and SIGN guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), metanalysis, systematic revisions and cohort studies in Spanish/English, published within the last 10 years, evaluating interventions to control preoperative chronic moderate to severe shoulder pain in patients undergoing RCR and their impact in postoperative shoulder outcomes were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Energy drink (ED) consumption is frequently observed among higher education students and is often associated with increased concentration and academic performance. However, the purported benefits are not fully supported by scientific evidence. This protocol details methods for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of ED on university students' mental health and academic performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, offering significant advancements in patient care, clinical workflows, and nursing education. While AI has the potential to enhance health outcomes and operational efficiency, its integration into nursing practice and education raises critical ethical, social, and educational challenges that must be addressed to ensure responsible and equitable adoption.

Objective: This umbrella review aims to evaluate the integration of AI into nursing practice and education, with a focus on ethical and social implications, and to propose evidence-based recommendations to support the responsible and effective adoption of AI technologies in nursing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!