A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fast Processing of Electron Microscopic Specimen Preserved Ultrastructure of Glomeruli and Electron-Dense Deposits in Diagnostic Renal Biopsies: A Prospective and Retrospective Comparative Study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The optimization of electron microscopy (EM) tissue processing protocols is urgent due to the rising number of renal biopsies needing EM for accurate diagnoses, with traditional methods taking 48-52 hours compared to a faster 8-hour microwave-based method.
  • - Concerns exist about the quality of the fast-processing EM (FEM) potentially affecting diagnoses; however, this study provides evidence that FEM produces comparably high-resolution images to the conventional EM (CEM).
  • - Both prospective and retrospective analyses showed no significant differences between FEM and CEM in terms of image quality and structural features of kidney tissues, indicating that FEM can be a reliable alternative for quicker diagnoses.

Article Abstract

Optimization of electron microscopy (EM) tissue processing protocols is essential to handle the global increase in the number of renal biopsies requiring EM for accurate diagnosis. The conventional EM processing method (CEM) is the standard method used by >95% of laboratories worldwide and it takes at least 48 to 52 hours for completion. In contrast, a fast-processing EM (FEM) method using microwave irradiation can be completed in 8 hours, allowing EM findings to be reported within 24 hours for most cases. There is widespread concern about the suboptimal quality of the FEM that may compromise its diagnostic roles; however, qualitative and quantitative data supporting the noninferiority of FEM compared with CEM has not been reported. We performed both prospective and retrospective studies. The prospective analysis compares FEM and CEM images from the same biopsy samples. For each case, the tissue was divided into 2 pieces: 1 piece for FEM processing and the second for CEM processing. The retrospective study compares the EM images of renal cases with electron-dense deposits from our archives that were processed either by FEM or CEM. The prospective analysis included 4 cases: lupus membranous nephropathy, IgA nephropathy, immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis, and acute tubular injury. Both FEM and CEM methods obtained high-resolution images with comparable quality. A quantitative morphometric analysis of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in the IgA nephropathy case showed similar GBM thickness when processed by the FEM and the CEM, suggesting that FEM did not affect GBM thickness. The retrospective study of 42 cases with electron-dense deposits showed that the ultrastructural features of electron-dense deposits were indistinguishable between the FEM and the CEM. This included microtubular substructures in immunotactoid glomerulonephritis, the "fingerprint" deposits in cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis, fibril deposits in the light chain amyloidosis as well as fibrillary glomerulonephritis, with comparable morphometric measurements of the deposits. The FEM is efficient, consistent, reproducible, and delivers comparable high-quality sections and images for diagnostic assessment of renal biopsies, compared with those attained by the CEM while decreasing turnaround time significantly, making it possible to provide faster and accurate diagnostic results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100662DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fem cem
20
electron-dense deposits
16
renal biopsies
12
fem
11
cem
9
prospective retrospective
8
prospective analysis
8
retrospective study
8
cases electron-dense
8
processed fem
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!