A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of Active Low Suction Pressure (Subgaleal) Drains in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery. | LitMetric

Use of Active Low Suction Pressure (Subgaleal) Drains in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery.

World Neurosurg

Department of Neurosurgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Published: December 2024

Background: Subdural drains are used to reduce recurrence after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. There is a small risk of parenchymal injury. We hypothesize that using subgaleal drains with low active suction (-50 mm Hg to -100 mm Hg) may be a safer alternative and still maintain efficacy in preventing recurrence.

Methods: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma at our institution was performed. They were classified into 2 groups: a subdural group and a subgaleal group. We collected data on patient demographics, preoperative use of antiplatelets or anticoagulants, the type of drains used, laterality of burr-hole surgery performed and postoperative complications, and recurrence. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

Results: 322 patients recruited, 172 received subgaleal drains with low active suction and 150 received passive subdural drains. There was no significant difference in the rate of recurrence; there was 11. % recurrence in the subgaleal drain group and 9.3% recurrence in the subdural drain group (P = 0.660). Patients who underwent active subgaleal drain insertion had significantly fewer complications, at 2.3% compared with 8.0% in patients who had passive subdural drains (P = 0.037).

Conclusions: The use of subgaleal drains with low active suction led to significantly lower complication rates compared with the use of subdural drains and maintained its efficacy in preventing recurrence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subgaleal drains
16
subdural drains
16
chronic subdural
12
subdural hematoma
12
drains low
12
low active
12
active suction
12
drains
9
subdural
9
efficacy preventing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!