Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: Perform a needs assessment for a novel leadership curriculum for otolaryngology residents.
Design: Cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Participants: To conduct the study, 37 OHNS faculty were surveyed, 23 (62%) of which submitted responses and 25 OHNS residents were surveyed, 19 (76%) of which responded. Surveys and semi-structured interviews were used to gather perspectives from residents and faculty. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests. Two reviewers analyzed the qualitative interviews via thematic analysis.
Results: From 42 survey responses, 96% of faculty and 100% of residents expressed support for a leadership curriculum. Topics considered most important for the curriculum included managing difficult conversations, building and influencing teams and making constructive use of conflict. Significant differences between faculty and residents in topic ratings included wellness (p = 0.001), professionalism (p = <0.001), and time management (p = 0.001) with faculty reporting ratings higher in importance than resident ratings. Nine faculty and 8 residents participated in qualitative interviews. Key themes identified included the learned aspect of leadership, an emphasis on 360 feedback, self-reflection on core values and leadership styles, and developing frameworks to engage in difficult conversations. Barriers to effective curriculum implementation included limited time, resident buy in, and the challenge of creating a 1-size-fits-all curriculum.
Conclusion: Both residents and faculty were interested in resident leadership development. Curriculum design with primary alignment with resident needs, based in high-yield, relevant topics will be essential to success. Such findings will be used to inform a pilot leadership curriculum at the local institution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103339 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!